<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you finding the right participants?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ux4np.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-finding-the-right-participants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ux4np.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-finding-the-right-participants/</link>
	<description>Employing UX methods in the non-profit world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jasonwilkens</title>
		<link>http://ux4np.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-finding-the-right-participants/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonwilkens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux4np.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-11</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great point, thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://ux4np.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/are-you-finding-the-right-participants/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux4np.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason,

Thanks for the mention. That post I wrote seemed to stir up a bit of controversy, interestingly enough. 

I totally agree with your post - most clients are likely to be in the middle. The client I wrote about should have found it easy to succeed with such a tightly defined user-base, but they forgot to speak to them during the design process. 

Taking a quick look at Matt Brown&#039;s post on lastFM, he says he recruited &quot;Long-time users who’ve been with us for years; new users still discovering what we do; friends and relatives; random people [...]&quot; 

Two of the four in that list are very tightly screened recruits. I&#039;d bet my bottom dollar that he wouldn&#039;t make any substantial design changes following feedback from randoms who don&#039;t even have a personal music player. 

LastFM didn&#039;t grow it&#039;s mass appeal by starting out aiming for the masses. The masses took a while to catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>Thanks for the mention. That post I wrote seemed to stir up a bit of controversy, interestingly enough. </p>
<p>I totally agree with your post &#8211; most clients are likely to be in the middle. The client I wrote about should have found it easy to succeed with such a tightly defined user-base, but they forgot to speak to them during the design process. </p>
<p>Taking a quick look at Matt Brown&#8217;s post on lastFM, he says he recruited &#8220;Long-time users who’ve been with us for years; new users still discovering what we do; friends and relatives; random people [...]&#8221; </p>
<p>Two of the four in that list are very tightly screened recruits. I&#8217;d bet my bottom dollar that he wouldn&#8217;t make any substantial design changes following feedback from randoms who don&#8217;t even have a personal music player. </p>
<p>LastFM didn&#8217;t grow it&#8217;s mass appeal by starting out aiming for the masses. The masses took a while to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
